Any ardent
supporter of the England national football team would drool over a first-team
squad like this:
GK: David James
RB: Gary Neville
CB: John Terry
CB: Rio Ferdinand
LB: Jamie Carragher
CM: Steven Gerrad
CM: Frank Lampard
CDM: Paul Scholes
RW: David Beckham
LW: Joe Cole
ST: Wayne Rooney
Add to this, a
bench which included the likes of Ashley Cole, Sol Campbell, Michael Owen,
Nicky Butt and Joey Barton among other household names, all at their prime, and
you have what was one of the most formidable sides to have ever played the
beautiful game. Sure, I've taken the occasional casting liberty and made slight
positional alterations to create this star studded formation, but isn't that
how it should’ve been? I mean, Paul Scholes and Jamie Carragher still had
several good years left when they prematurely called it quits on their
international careers, as was evident from their stellar performances for
United and Liverpool respectively. Anyway, this was the exact side which started
most of England’s games in Euro 2004 – Not too far off is it?
But despite their
seemingly illustrious demeanor which could intimidate almost any opposing
manager or player if they so much as glanced at England’s team sheet, this divinely
assembled squad is astonishingly remembered for all the wrong reasons and is
often associated with all that could have been. Be it the frequent clash of big
egos resulting in poor team spirit, bad coaching decisions like deploying Paul
Scholes in a wide position, or the failed Lampard-Gerrad midfield partnership, excuses
such as these began to characterize the squad and the end result was simple failure to
deliver on the pitch.
The side’s glorious
celebrity status didn't help either, nor did the fact that they were constantly juxtaposed, if not directly compared, to the highly acclaimed world cup winning
England side of 1966. The fact that this was England’s solitary world cup trophy throughout their glamorous history and that this was the side widely touted to end the wait for a second, piled even more pressure onto the talented lot. Put plainly, the weight
of expectation coupled with poor man management wore down and eventually broke
this great team.
But quite contrary
to popular belief, the future doesn't look all that bleak for the three
lions – at least on paper, given the oodles of talented young protégés churned
up by English clubs each year. However, if the past has taught us
anything, it is never to blindly trust what we see on paper as it can be deceptive. For this very
reason, I decided to take a stab at analyzing the flaws of previous England
sides to;
- Devise an appropriate formation
- Attempt to select the potentially best from the rest
- Predict potential success, failure or the same old homespun mediocrity
With all that said,
I think England’s next generation squad should look somewhat like this:
Barring Joe Hart,
who should captain this side, everyone in the squad will be below 25 years of
age with few occasional exceptions. Keepers tend to peak later in their
footballing careers and Hart’s quality, experience, and leadership on the pitch
will be much needed. The purpose is to start afresh with a nascent goal to rid the team of unnecessary heads. I would love to see England consider a squad like this for a change and play a simple 4-2-3-1 formation. It certainly won’t bring instant success and Euro 2016 will have to be sacrificed for the purpose of implementing it properly, but England don’t have much to lose either – It’s not like they are poised to win the next major competition, so it makes sense that they rather build for Russia 2018. To that effect, here is the squad I would place my money on:
NO.
|
PLAYER
|
POSITION
|
CLUB
|
1
|
Joe Hart ( C )
|
GK
|
Manchester City
F.C
|
2
|
Eric Dier
|
RB
|
Tottenham Hotspur
F.C.
|
3
|
Calum Chambers
|
CB
|
Arsenal F.C.
|
4
|
Phil Jones
|
CB
|
Manchester United
F.C.
|
5
|
Luke Shaw
|
LB
|
Manchester United
F.C.
|
6
|
Adam Lallana
|
RW
|
Liverpool F.C.
|
7
|
Raheem Sterling
|
LW
|
Liverpool F.C.
|
8
|
Jordan Henderson
|
CDM
|
Liverpool F.C.
|
9
|
Jack Wilshere
|
CM
|
Arsenal F.C.
|
10
|
Ross Barkeley
|
CAM
|
Everton F.C.
|
11
|
Daniel Sturridge
( VC )
|
ST
|
Liverpool F.C.
|
SUBSTITUTES
|
|||
1
|
Danny Rose
|
LB
|
Tottenham Hotspur
F.C.
|
2
|
Jack Rodwell
|
CDM
|
Sunderland A.F.C.
|
3
|
Jon Flanagan
|
RB
|
Liverpool F.C.
|
4
|
Chris Smalling
|
CB/RB
|
Manchester United
F.C.
|
5
|
John Stones
|
CB
|
Everton F.C.
|
6
|
Kieran Gibbs
|
LB
|
Arsenal F.C.
|
7
|
Harry Kane
|
ST/FW
|
Tottenham Hotspur
F.C.
|
8
|
Nathaniel
Chalobah
|
CDM
|
Chelsea F.C.
|
9
|
Connor Wickham
|
CDM/CB
|
Sunderland
|
10
|
Jack Butland
|
GK
|
Stoke City F.C.
|
11
|
Alex
Oxlade-Chamberlain
|
RW/LW
|
Arsenal F.C.
|
PROSPECTIVE
CALL-UPS
|
|||
12
|
Tyler Blackett
|
CB/LB
|
Manchester United
F.C.
|
13
|
Jordan Rhodes
|
ST
|
Blackburn Rovers
F.C.
|
14
|
Michael Keane
|
CB
|
Manchester United
F.C.
|
15
|
Nathan Redmond
|
LW/RW
|
Norwich City F.C.
|
16
|
Zeki Fryers
|
LB
|
Tottenham Hotspur
F.C.
|
17
|
Theo Walcott
|
RW/ST
|
Arsenal F.C.
|
If your wondering why Tottenham pair, Kyle Walker and Andros Townsend, do not appear in the team-sheet, its probably because they have not been very convincing for England despite being given several opportunities to prove their salt. But, I wouldn't rule them out entirely and certainly think that they should be a part of the fray, as should Chelsea's Patrick Bamford, Southampton's James Ward-Prowse and Manchester United's Nick Powell. The fact is there are too many 'potential starlets' today, while attaining even a glimmer of success depends on the ability to weed out misfits.
This is a system built around the concepts of youth, a fresh start and an even playing field – Basically, a player’s brand or celebrity status will have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on his chances to feature in the national side. Since long, the English FA has stuck to a rigid age-old mentality that required the nation’s best players to perform exceptionally and become big stars at club level before being given the opportunity to earn their first cap. While I believe this to be a fairly sound approach, I feet that England wait a little too long before providing first-team opportunities to very talented youth players, which isn't always the best thing to do. It’s almost as if a player isn't worthy to play for the country if he doesn't start for his club every week and this is not always true – We have seen numerous shining examples of players who performed brilliantly for their countries but weren't all that great for their clubs and vice versa, namely Miroslav Klose and Thierry Henry respectively.
Returning to the England squad from that minor digression, I think it’s best if we reverse the system discussed above - Instead of having promising players become stars first and then earn a place in the team, why not give them the opportunity to play for their nation from a younger age and become stars along the way? This way, they will be able to keep their egos in check, or won’t even have any since they are only eager kids who are enthused to play the game and just grateful for the opportunity to represent their country at such a young age. They will learn to love and respect the national team, before some of them go on to earn millions in club football. More importantly, they won’t have to fixate on earning their first cap for their country and then try too hard to perform in a platonically assembled team consisting of peers who have been hits at their respective clubs, but have never played together before. As clichéd as it may sound, real football management is seldom like FIFA 14, although it would be great if it were! You cannot simply put together a bunch of fairly senior proven star players and expect them to deliver – They have to be nurtured, preferably since their early playing days, in order to adapt to each other’s styles. In this process, a manager will realize that some of his favored selections didn't really work out, while others will surprise and that is why a team is built, not assembled.
If his work at Tottenham and Portsmouth are any testament, having a strict and experienced disciplinarian like Harry Redknapp to manage such a young, volatile side will be a must. Moreover, Redknapp seems like a man on a mission; someone who actually cares about England and with a robust plan to bring about a positive change in paradigm, or at least his interviews tend to suggest that.
I think the only
way English football can move forward is if they let go of their past
– At present, there are way too many dead-weights and under-performers included
in the team based on meaningless reputations, which are weighing the side down.
With this mentality, it is difficult to expect the requisite and sought after radical change -
There will always be weak links in the team as every senior player with a shiny
profile will want to hold onto his place, irrespective of his actual contribution
on the pitch. If it were a professional business setting, the term ‘accountability’
might resoundingly come to mind.
With that said, I believe that everything that has been done thus
far, hasn't been all and entirely detrimental – There were definitely some good
points to ponder on. Taking a cue from their performance at this world cup, for
instance, I enjoyed watching England attack with lightening pace in a team that
was technically built around Liverpool’s Raheem Sterling. It may not have been
as evident to the naked eye, but he was given a playmaker’s role and was
clearly the fulcrum of the squad. It showed that the talented youngster can
operate well as the cog in the side, is adept at handling high pressure
situations without crumbling and flourishes in a free role where he can pull all the strings.
One thing that perspicuously did not work in England’s
favor was the much hyped mix of youth and experience which
they possessed. Personally, I consider this ideology to be overrated and
almost never used in the correct context - It makes sense only when you have a
well-functioning unit that has played together for a sufficient period of time,
like the Germans. It does not blatantly mean that you pick five experienced
players and six promising youngsters at random. Despite his impressive club record
and his legions of dedicated fans worldwide, Wayne Rooney has not been a hit for England
- In fact, none of the persisting superstars of the golden generation have been
able to fire on all cylinders, even with major changes to the squad. It is important that players
like Steven Gerrad and Wayne Rooney understand this harsh reality and reckon that it is time
to move on. It’s the decent thing to do and the only way things have a chance to
change for the better. There is no point in retaining ample
experience just for the sake of it, and if
experienced players aren't contributing equally to the cause, they must be
subjected to the same fate as their colleagues. Competency, merit and performance must be given equal, if not more, importance than superfluous 'years of service'.
Following in the light of this concept, the system in
question will need certain players of yesteryear and even the generation, to
simply move on. Especially the big misfiring names vis-à-vis Gerrad, Rooney, Glen
Johnson, and Ashley Young. Frank Lampard has already retired although he should’ve done so earlier. If these players consecutively announce
their retirements, others of a similar mold will soon follow suit until the entire
bandwagon of expendables is cleared out - An old fashioned downsizing of sorts, if you will. Even fairly decent performers like Gary
Cahill should seriously consider their place or be willing to rotate, in an
effort to conform to the objectives of the long-term project – One in which the
country comes first and no player is bigger than the team.
Sadly, this is the only way the model can
work effectively - The young guns must be trusted with the opportunity to run the show
independently and autonomously, without being overshadowed by their decorated
predecessors. Germany and France have already understood this, which is why Ribery,
Lahm, and Mertersacker called time on their careers when they didn’t have
to. It is a risky approach, but also one which has paid handsome dividends to the
German and Belgian national sides in recent years. France has also adopted a
similar philosophy and Spain is on the verge of doing so. In today’s world of football,
change is the only constant and there isn't much in the way of a secure
approach.
3 comments:
Hey craig , through this piece you have captured some vital points not only what England should do for their National Football Squad , but also from a management perspective . If I have to pick some take home points they would be a) all star studded teams come with egos overriding the common goal b) how do superstars know when it's time to step aside c) blending experience and freshness in a squad d) trusting the new breed to play the lead . Super stuff Criag.
Very well laid out, Craig. England have nothing to lose. So might as well take this approach and build a formidable team for the future. Great article! Hope the FA spots this and open their eyes. Time for change.
Excellent post mate, although I would still go with Ox over Lallana in the starting line-up. Now, to get the gaffer to notice ..
Post a Comment